Posted: 10:31 am on 21st January 2015

 

research-paper-writing1-300x200

The Australian Research Council is a pretty fertile hunting-ground for WasteWatch.

The ARC have just released the details of their latest round of Discovery Project grants, which are designed to “deliver cultural, economic, social and environmental benefits to all Australians.”

Sometimes this aspiration seems to be, as Hamlet said, more honoured in the breach than the observance.

Of course, most of the projects deliver benefits to someone.

For example, sensitive and single high school boys around the nation will no doubt be thrilled by the $154,000 investigation by two philosophy professors into that age-old question: do “nice guys finish last”? Their “empirical investigation of the circumstances in which moral behaviour can have harmful side-effects” will give lifestyle blogs enough new content to last for years.

Or what about the $183,000 study of China’s rural migrant workers, which will “demonstrate unequivocally that love and romance are far from ‘trivial’ for these individuals”? The mind boggles.

A particular favourite, however, is the $333,000 history of… opinion polls. Not only can our day-to-day life be blighted by the constant pressures of short-termist, poll-driven politicians, now we get to fork out for the privilege of watching their corrosive impact over the last 75 years too!

Your tax dollars at work.

William Shrubb

The ARC's curious interest in China | CIS Waste Watch says:

[…] the recent $183,000 of your money the Australian Research Council gave to one lucky academic to study China’s rural migrant […]

That’s funny lookin': How to turn ARC funding outcome documents into comedy gold | Benjamin Wilkie says:

[…] Anyway, they’ve been paying particular attention to ARC grants since sometime in 2013. Their most recent posts are here, here, and here. […]

Leave a Reply

Please note we will only be posting selected comments.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *